Convergence in liquid metals

Questions and discussions regarding the use of Qbox
Forum rules
You must be a registered user to post in this forum. Registered users may also post new topics if they consider that their subject does not correspond to any topic already present on the forum.
Post Reply
gpanchap
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 1:25 am

Convergence in liquid metals

Post by gpanchap »

In my liquid Si runs, as soon as I include empty states the total energy doesn't seem to converge anymore. This is my input: (with nempty=0 the total energy converges ~mRy in about 200 scf. steps):

si2.sys #unit cell, psp and positions for N=200 atoms
set ecut 15 #kin. en. cutoff in Ry
set empty 50 #Total of 450 states
set fermi_temp 1000 #temp. in K. (Entropy=wf_entropy*kB*fermi_T/2.0)
set wf_dyn PSD
set charge_mix_coeff 0.001 #small value for metals
set ecutprec 5
run 0 1000

The energy appears to converge till the occupation gets smeared, which is then followed by a large jump in the energy (~ 200Ry) and rapid oscillations in energy after that. Interestingly, after a few hundred steps the entropy goes to zero (no occ. smearing), and the oscillation is between 'two' limiting values, each of which is well converged.

Last few lines of etotal_int:

<etotal_int> -547.09271275 </etotal_int>
<etotal_int> -548.52868450 </etotal_int>
<etotal_int> -547.09364208 </etotal_int>
<etotal_int> -548.52820650 </etotal_int>
<etotal_int> -547.09454015 </etotal_int>
<etotal_int> -548.52761111 </etotal_int>
<etotal_int> -547.09549035 </etotal_int>
<etotal_int> -548.52715518 </etotal_int>


Would you know what could be going on, and if there is a better scheme to achieve convergence in metals ?
gpanchap
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 1:25 am

Re: Convergence in liquid metals

Post by gpanchap »

Including a non-zero value for nite and changing the mixing coefficient to 0.8 gets rid of this problem. But convergence is still quite slow, requiring 'run 0 50 5' initially to converge to ~ 10mRy. Subsequently it requires 'run 100 30 5' . Is it possible to enter a tolerance in convergence (energy, wfk, etc.) so that I don't have to perform the same number of steps (i.e nscf*nite) at each ionic step? Thanks.
fgygi
Site Admin
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:03 pm

Re: Convergence in liquid metals

Post by fgygi »

This feature is not yet available. The implementation of a convergence criterion for the termination of the self-consistent loop is being considered in upcoming releases.
Post Reply